Welcome to Battlestar Wiki!
Welcome to the Wiki, Manscher. Feel free to tell us about yourself on your user page. Before you get started on other edits, please read the Standards and Conventions, which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the tutorial and the wiki markup code pages for assistance.
We encourage you to participate in any projects on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the Original Series Article Development Project and several language translations of Battlestar Wiki. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the Think Tank, where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.
Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the Wikipedian Quorum or the Administrators' noticeboard. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)!
Hi, there. I rolled back your recent edit to the Number Six article. Technically, "Sharon Valerii" is the correct notation for that section: There wasn't a distinction between "Boomer" and the Caprica copy except their location and the fact that one was a sleeper agent and one was not. The article section you edited can't quite use "Sharon Agathon" because the two aren't married yet. You can use [[Sharon Agathon|a copy of Sharon Valerii]] as a link, but to avoid confusion in how events are described, using the character's current name leads to more confusion. --Spencerian 00:03, 31 December 2006 (CST)
- I disagree. Using "Sharon Valerii" is misleading; the Number Eight article also clearly distinguishes between Sharon "Boomer" Valerii and Sharon "Athena" Agathon. Also, the exceptions you mention are crucial. Thus it should be clear which copy this is (which is, by the way, clear to the viewer from the start). However, I agree that she is not (yet) Sharon Agathon. I have given it another try; see what you think. Please don't roll back, but try to edit towards a text satisfactory to both of us :-) --Manscher 03:31, 31 December 2006 (CST)